• About Pawlet
  • Arts
  • Dining
  • Things to Do
  • Scenic Rides
  • Historic
  • Where to Stay

Category Archives: Pawlet Happenings

Elevator to Nowhere

22 Sunday Sep 2019

Posted by Eve Ogden Schaub in Pawlet Happenings

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

elevator to nowhere, pawlet public library, pawlet town meeting

I’ve lived in a small Vermont town for the last 22 years. In that time one thing has struck me time and again: how very, very, very important it is To Show Up. Unlike the large, anonymous suburb where I was raised, in a small town one person’s voice really can change the conversation, turn the tide, make a difference. I’ve seen it.

PPC

Pawlet Projects Committee circa 2000 (That’s me with baby Greta in the front row middle)

 

The only catch is that it takes time. Years ago, our local Town Meeting used to take a whole day and involve voting on the floor. Today? Town Meeting is held at night, competing with dinner hour, homework and a million other commitments. Attendance is dwindling and consequently so is participation.

Inevitably, there are those who like it better that way. After all, when you have meetings no one shows up to, you can get a lot done, without all the messy, uncomfortable questions that public participation can bring.

I’ll give you a for instance. Last December I was asked to join the Library Board in my town of Pawlet, so I went to a meeting to find out more. I learned that they were contemplating an expansion to the library projected to cost the town $300,000, yet at the time no one on the Library Board seemed to be particularly in favor of it.

This struck me as odd. Something was up, I thought. I decided not to join the Library Board.

Instead, I spent the next few months showing up. I attended meetings and asked questions. I found out that it all started when the Pawlet Library asked the Select Board to fix a simple problem: in the winter months the handicapped access ramp was covered with falling ice and snow. Could anything be done about this? An architect was hired.

This is when the $300,000 project was introduced.

As you can imagine, the expensive plan doesn’t just fix the ramp’s ice and snow problem. Instead, it calls for the existing handicapped access ramp to be demolished, and a whole new entryway added. It calls for an elevator to the lower level and for a handicapped access bathroom to be added there.

Which would be great if there was this awesome series of rooms that was anxiously awaiting access down there, but unfortunately there isn’t. What is down there is what you would expect in the basement of a three-room schoolhouse built in 1912: a small basement room with tiny windows and two large support columns obstructing the center.

It is called the Matt Waite Room, because several years ago it was fixed up and turned into usable space in memory of one of our beloved residents. I’m not knocking this space, mind you- it would be perfect as a room for additional book stacks, or extra reading space, or perhaps more computer carrels… but all of these uses are redundant to the ones upstairs and would therefore not necessitate an expensive elevator.

The fact is that no one has ever formally complained about poor access to this room- I know, because I asked. That’s probably because there are many great meeting spaces in town that not only accommodate large groups and exhibitions, but already have handicapped access: the elementary school gym, the Congregational Church meeting room, and the Pawlet Town Hall auditorium. Which means that to date our town has spent over $12,500 on architectural plans that solve a nonexistent problem.

Why?

The reason repeatedly given to me was because the Select Board wanted it. By showing up, however, anyone could plainly see this was not the case. In fact, clear support was expressed by only one of the five Select Board members.

All of this is weird enough. But then I attended the most recent Library Board meeting. I gave them an actual transcript from a Select Board meeting, demonstrating the lack of consensus, so that they didn’t have to just take my word for it.

Now, I really didn’t expect them to say, “Hey thanks, Eve! You know, for doing all this work to try to clear up the confusion! ” But I also didn’t expect what did happen.

The Chair of the Library Board eyed me. She skeptically cited my attendance at many meetings, and how much time was involved. Then she said: “I have to ask. What is your motivation in all this?”

As a matter of fact, I do have a motivation. I was one of the founding members of the Pawlet Projects Committee, which worked to save the abandoned schoolhouse in our historic town center, ultimately turning it into our beautiful community library. The first meeting was held in my living room. For years we worked tirelessly to fundraise and grant-write, and ultimately to move the library from a cramped room of the Town Hall to its expansive new site across the street.

But all that is assuming that simply being a concerned citizen is not enough, which it is. I understand that the Library Board wants me to go away and stop asking uncomfortable questions. But you know what? Whether this project- this elevator to nowhere- gets built or not, I have a right to show up. We all do. We all have a right to disagree, and we all have a right to ask questions. Even uncomfortable ones.

Especially uncomfortable ones.

In fact, as it turns out, that’s what public meetings are for.

So I encourage you to show up. Go to your next public meeting- no matter what it is­— Zoning Board, Planning Commission, Design Review Board— and See What’s Happening. Yes, it will take time, and yes there will be boredom- there’s always that. But you never know what you might find out, what questions you might ask that will make a difference. If you live in Pawlet show up and ask why we need a $300,000 boondoggle instead of a nice, serviceable ramp roof. If they look at you askance and ask you what your motivation is, you will know: you’re doing some good.

Town Meeting is SOON

11 Monday Feb 2019

Posted by Eve Ogden Schaub in local event, Pawlet Happenings

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

pawlet town meeting, town meeting 2018, town meeting warning, vermont local news

Get ready Pawlet people! Town Meeting approaches… scheduled for Monday, March 4th at the Mettawee Community School.

Please note that this meeting will not include the school budget. (The school budget meeting is on Feb 27th, 7 PM, Mettawee Community School.)

Curious what’s on the ballot this year? LOTS of stuff- it’s long this year, but nothing terribly crazy or controversial- it’s mostly requests from various local nonprofit organizations. Here it is:

Warning-for-Pawlet-Annual-Meeting-2019

Chesnut-Tangerman Responds; Cleveland Opts Out

17 Wednesday Oct 2018

Posted by Eve Ogden Schaub in Pawlet Happenings

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

community forum, middletown springs vermont, pawlet firehouse, pawlet vermont, rupert vermont, tinmouth vermont, vermont representative, wells vermont

Monday night at the Pawlet firehouse there was an interesting development in the race for district representative. In an open forum, intended to showcase the different viewpoints of the men running to represent our lovely corner of Vermont: one of the two candidates failed to show up.

IMG_9412

A Full House Monday Night at the Candidate Forum

Not that anyone was particularly surprised by this fact. Ed Cleveland, who is running in hopes of unseating third term incumbent Robin Chesnut-Tangerman, had early on declined to participate in the forum.

Nevertheless, more than one voter— both those who know Cleveland personally, as well as others who have never met him— stood up not so much to ask a question, as to express disappointment and frustration that Cleveland would not appear to discuss his views, and explain how they might differ from the incumbent’s. In an unusual move, Cleveland seems to be participating in no public events in support of his candidacy.

Instead of the hoped-for dialogue, Chesnut-Tangerman took the opportunity to introduce himself as a candidate he hopes has been “building a reputation for being serious, consistent, and open-minded,” and took questions from the audience.

Many questions centered on the controversial proposed “carbon tax,” which aims to encourage alternate, sustainable energy sources by increasing gas taxes a total of 35 cents per gallon over the next eight years.

“The question is not ‘Are we going to have a carbon tax?'” Chesnut-Tangerman said, “the question is, ‘What are we going to do about climate change?’ A carbon tax is just one tool.” he went on to point out that he does not support Vermont “going it alone” with a carbon tax, but only if it were implemented throughout the New England region in a coordinated effort.

He said that many ways to mitigate the negative effects of such a tax are being explored, such as the exclusion of off-road diesel used by farming equipment, and the purchase of electric school buses with Vermont’s share of money from the Volkswagen settlement. Chesnut-Tangerman added that although he supports the carbon tax in theory, it is unlikely to move forward if Governor Scott is reelected.

Also covered was a proposed plan to change the manner in which public education receives funding: deriving from a percentage of resident income rather than, as it does now, from property taxes. Property taxes are not a reliable indicator of ability to pay, Chesnut-Tangerman explained, stating that over 70 percent of Vermont residents receive income sensitivity adjustments to their property tax bills.

“Why not just tax income?” Chesnut-Tangerman said, indicating that this would result in greater fairness and “equity in our tax payments.”

Other issues covered were the fact that Chesnut-Tangerman does not accept any PAC or corporate campaign donations, the lack of adequate funding for mental health facilities and continuing education, and that, although he disagrees with Governor Scott on many issues, he commended the governor for changing his position on gun control.

“I see that as political courage,” Chesnut-Tangerman said.

Asked to name the top ideas he’d focus on if reelected, Chesnut-Tangerman cited conductivity (broad band expansion), a livable minimum wage, and health care.

www.RobinForRep.com                https://clevelandforhouse.org/

 

You’re Kidding Me, Right? Rupert Revote TODAY

15 Thursday Feb 2018

Posted by Eve Ogden Schaub in local event, Pawlet Happenings

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

pawlet rupert school merger, rupert revote, school choice vermont

SCHOOL MERGER REVOTE: RUPERT POLLS OPEN TODAY 10 AM to 7PM

Remember how I was afraid to be happy about the school merger vote passing in both Rupert and Pawlet? How I had this weird, lingering doubt that this contentious issue could possibly have been put to rest at last?

Funny story.

Turns out some Rupert residents petitioned for- and got- the right to revote the merger question.

So… right.

Maybe I just haven’t been paying attention, but this particular vote seems to me to be especially, almost troublingly, quiet– especially in contrast to the previous hubbubs. I have yet to see ANY publicizing of the vote today in any of the local media. I haven’t driven through Rupert lately, so I don’t know if there are exclamation-point-filled signs out arguing with each other again, but somehow I doubt it. Mum seems to be the word this time- on both sides.

To make it legal, of course, a few days ago they still had to hold the four-zillionth public informational meeting- also unpublicized as far as I could tell. Maybe you’re one of the people who could bear to go rehash the same arguments over yet again, who isn’t sick to death of the division, the bickering, and what has devolved into some pretty nasty name-calling. I wasn’t.

I love asking super-obvious questions so here goes: is there a single solitary soul left in either town who is still on the fence here? Are any minds being changed at this point? I don’t think so. Rather, I think this is more of an “Are you sure??” vote.

So, for better or for worse the moment is here— again— for Rupert residents to be heard. Please Rupert- go vote. Today. For crying out loud.

And stay tuned.

Pawlet Rupert Merger Approved

22 Wednesday Nov 2017

Posted by Eve Ogden Schaub in Pawlet Happenings

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Pawlet and Rupert vote, Pawlet Rupert Merger Committee, pawlet rupert school merger, school choice versus designation

The Pawlet Rupert School Merger was approved yesterday by a vote of 259 to 201 in Pawlet and a vote of 150 to 142 in Rupert… It needed to be approved in both towns in order to be viable, so Rupert’s slim margin of only six votes proves more than ever that every single vote really does count.

Are we allowed to feel relieved that this years-long decision may finally be resolved? I’m not sure yet. This argument has gone on so long, and had so many unexpected twists and turns it’s been like a soap opera that never ends… But nevertheless, tomorrow I’ll be giving thanks that our community may finally be able to move on.

Signs of a Town Divided

21 Tuesday Nov 2017

Posted by Eve Ogden Schaub in Pawlet Happenings

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

defaced signs, merger vote today, pawlet rupert school merger, school merger pawlet, signs of conflict

In case you’ve been a hermit for the last few months, I’d like to let you know that our towns have a vote today. Simply put, the question is whether or not the voters of Pawlet and Rupert want to approve the school merger plan. The plan consolidates our school districts, does not designate any particular high school, and would keep us part of the BRSU (Bennington Rutland Supervisory Union.) Polls open at 10AM and close at 7PM. There will also be the opportunity to vote for members of the new merged school board.

If you harbor any doubt that our two towns are a bit -ah- conflicted about the school merger vote today, all you need to do is take a little sightseeing tour of the area. The signs are everywhere. Literally.

I have to give the “NO” signs points for better creativity and enthusiasm… you’ll notice many of the signs say “no” as many as six or eight times. 

The yes signs are out in abundance too, but most of them don’t even say “yes” on them… which I thought was a little weird.

And then there are the defaced signs. I ran across two prominent signs which had been spray painted with red cross-out symbols to forcibly transform them from “yes” to “no”…

See what I mean? Conflicted. I don’t know what the results of today’s vote will be, but can we all agree that this debate has gone on for far too long and been far too debilitating to the fabric of our community?

For my part, I now know that there are some folks in town who will never think I’m a “real” resident, for a variety of arbitrary reasons- I moved here, my whole family doesn’t live here, I don’t work in a local business- and I’m kind of sorry to know that. I liked my illusion better: that we all lived in one town and despite our differences, despite our debates, we could all agree on one thing: we are a community. And a damn good one at that.

So okay. I still love my town, even if every last inch of it might not love me back. I can live with that. No matter the results of today’s vote, there will still be kids in Pawlet, and Rupert too. They’ll still go to school, and we still care about them all.

Merger Proposal Reconfigured

06 Friday Oct 2017

Posted by Eve Ogden Schaub in Pawlet Happenings

≈ 6 Comments

Tags

act 46, Pawlet Rupert Merger Committee

When last I posted about the ongoing school merger debate, it was nearly a year ago, but of course the debate, and the merger process, has continued.

To sum up: Last November in a non-binding referendum, both Pawlet and Rupert voted in favor of keeping designated schools in New York for grades 7-12. As a result, Wells, the third town of the proposed merger whose representatives favored school choice, went elsewhere to find merger buddies. Pawlet and Rupert then formed a new merger committee, and two weeks ago some members of that new committee made a merger proposal to the Vermont Board of Education, (you can watch the video below)

, our proposal comes up at 4:09) The state turned this proposal down, largely on the basis that they found the new proposal did not provide “equity,” a founding principle of Act 46, which essentially means that all children are to be given reasonable access to equivalent school programs.

Which brings us to last night’s meeting. It was standing room only in the Mettawee Community School library as the merger committee met and exchanged views on what had happened at the state and debated how to move forward. So what happened?

Here is the upshot: the committee voted four to three in favor of resubmitting the merger proposal with changes that remove designation from the plan.

In the absence of designated schools, the new merger of Pawlet and Rupert that is being proposed would by default entail school choice, with every student able to use up to the Vermont union state average annual tuition (currently $15,480).

A new merged school board could attempt to return to designation at some later date, but any attempt to designate the Granville and Salem schools in New York would be contingent on two things: an approval from town voters, and the state of Vermont changing the existing law.

If you’ve got all that then here’s what happens next: (Note- Update!! Some dates changed from the original posting )

October 18th- members of the merger committee will present this new plan to the Vermont Board of Education

November 14th- tentative date, public forum/informational meeting, time & location TBA. Also an informational mailing is planned.

November 21st- if the state approves the new merger proposal, this is the tentative date for Pawlet and Rupert residents to vote on the proposed merger.

That’s really what you need to know. A video of the merger meeting was made last night, so if someone sends me the link I will post it here.

A few snapshots from the evening:

“The democratic process was completely perverted… I’m coming out of this quite sad.”

—John Malcolm, committee member, (Referring to the state rejection of the previous plan)

 

“I just want folks to understand that if we don’t have a successful merger, we all lose.”

—Scott McChesney, committee member, (Pointing out that, if either town were to vote the new proposed merger down, both towns would lose associated tax incentives, and could end up designated to a Vermont school such as Poultney, not have the ability to attend Granville or Salem, and still have to pay the Vermont state average.)

 

“I support getting the merger done. If there’s still interest in designation, the new board could do it… (but) you’d have to deal with 827 (the existing law) too.”

—Jackie Wilson, BRSU Superintendant

 

“I don’t think the voters support it… (but) I’m for democracy. People are free to lobby… they have a right to do it.”

—Bill Meyer, committee member

 

“I would vote for a merger, and let the townspeople decide… talking about democracy, then we’re being democratic.”

—Gene Ceglowski, committee member

 

“We just have to move forward… our charge is to make sure people understand the options.”

—Diane Mach, committee member

 

“(Under the new merger proposal) we can have Granville and Salem and all these schools.” 

—Michael Krauss, resident

 

“(This merger) could be possibly the only way you get to choose Granville.”

—Heather Lund, resident

 

“I feel strongly that we need to tone down the rhetoric… This town is going to remain divided if people don’t begin to talk civilly to each other.”

Arlene Bentley, resident

 

“It is not political, it is constitutional… Everyone in the state gets the state average tuition except our two towns.”

—Jim Cole, resident

 

“I think perhaps the hostility would come down if we had more facts.”

—Christina Cosgrove, resident

 

“It would be so helpful to know the net tax impact (of the proposed merger).”

—David Nichols, resident

 

“It’s got to be put out to the public as simple as possible.”

—Regina Mason, resident. (on the confusing nature of past informational materials)

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • May 2025
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • June 2022
  • February 2022
  • September 2021
  • April 2021
  • December 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • February 2019
  • October 2018
  • February 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • March 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2012
  • August 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011

Categories

  • arts
  • local event
  • Local Food
  • Pawlet Happenings
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • pawletvermont.com
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • pawletvermont.com
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...